Marketing Was Never Supposed to Be This Way (My TEDx Talk)

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

 

TRANSCRIPT

On Easter Sunday in 1929, a group of rich female debutants joined the annual Parade in New York City, and shocked a nation.

In one beautifully orchestrated moment, they pulled out cigarettes they had hidden under their clothes, lit them up, and strolled down the street smoking for all to see – including the press.

You see women at the turn of the 20th century did NOT smoke in public. It was something only a man (and women paid to sleep with men) could do. So you can imagine the newspapers the next day…..

But it’s not what you expect. Headlines across the nation called these women “powerful and independent suffragettes.” And they weren’t just smoking cigarettes, they were “lighting up torches of freedom.”

You see there was a marketer behind this, of course. There’s always a marketer behind these things. His name was Edward Bernays, and he had issued a press release the day before telling them what was going to happen, and armed them with that phrase “torches of freedom”.  You may have never heard that name, but as a consumer in the 21st century, Edward Bernays has impacted your life and the way you live it.

He was an American propagandist in World War 1, and after the war, companies needed to do something with all of the goods they were mass-producing. So they hired Bernays to create new kinds of consumers. The president of the American tobacco corporation, in this case, had approached him to solve what he felt was a problem. Only half of his market were smoking – just men. To sell more cigarettes, Edward Bernays needed to create a new kind of female– one that wasn’t ashamed of smoking in public like many were at the time. And so he used mass manipulation to link the cigarette to a sense of of independence, power, things important to women at this time in history, having just earned the right to vote. He single handedly created a new market for cigarettes with a marketing stunt.

And it worked. Women’s adoption of cigarettes rose steadily, jumping to $32 million in the year that followed this act.

And Bernays went on to replicate this model for all kinds of clients, from clothing brands to banks.. and create a framework for marketing that we are stuck with today.

It’s because of Bernays that we see product placement in movies. That we see movie stars and celebrities wearing certain brands. That the clothing we see in a magazine can be purchased down the street at a convenient department store. He’s the reason bacon and bananas are part of an all-American diet, and why cars are symbols of male sexuality.

He orchestrated a world where we have to buy certain things in order to be a certain kind of person.

And the model set up by Bernays is this: Here’s the product. Let’s use marketing to create consumers that fit this product. Product-centric marketing.

See, Bernays was kind of an awkward guy, in fact he rarely looked people in the eye. He thought of people in groups, not as individuals, and saw them as easily manipulated masses. What I haven’t told you about was Bernays’s family tree. He was the nephew of psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud.

To Edward Bernays, this model for marketing was just propaganda. Mass consumer persuasion.

He felt that “if you could use propaganda for war, you can use it in times of peace.” But the irony here is that this model not only inspired what we know today as marketing… it inspired Hitler’s ministry of propaganda.

They saw people as faceless crowds, easily forged into a pre-defined way of thinking / feeling / acting.

And unfortunately we haven’t been able to shake this mindset as marketers. And that’s the problem.

Nearly 100 years later, we waste hundreds of billions of dollars every year trying to create the kind of consumers we want, mold those that fit our products. Marketing has become an all-encompassing force in our world. It’s everything. It’s everywhere. We see between 500 to 3,000 marketing messages a day.

And the response of marketers has been to create more noise across more channels in an effort to get their message out to more people! But this strategy doesn’t work.

Consumers don’t trust companies. They tune out the noise of irrelevant marketing, they skip the ads, ignore the commercials. You’re more likely to get into Harvard, survive a plane crash or win the lottery than click a banner ad.

We have failed you as marketers because we are the center of our own universe. We become experts on our products and think we know all there is to know about our buyers. The truth is we don’t.

When was the last time you interacted with a company and felt…. Man, they reallyget me. It’s rare. When it happens, it’s almost magical it’s like finding a unicorn. And you’re loyal to that brand, because they’ve taken the time to get to know you, and given you the type of experience you want.

And that’s the point.

A friend recently told me that the origin of the word company comes from the concept of breaking bread together. Isn’t that incredible?

Great marketing is personal. It’s humanized. You don’t need to be a marketer to know this. It treats you like an individual. It speaks to you on your terms. It respects you - it doesn’t make you feel like you’re not good enough. It uses your language, reflects your priorities, speaks to your hearts and minds… not your vanity, not your ego.

Nearly a decade in this industry has proven to me that this is the only way forward as marketers.  If we have any chance of earning, of deserving the attention of our overwhelmed customers, we cannot buy it. If we’re going to cut through the noise, we must demonstrate that we understand who they are.

This new model is simple… it’s customer-centric, not product-centric. And it would terrify Edward Bernays, because it requires a skill he did not have: empathy. Seeing the world through the eyes of another. We are hard-wired for empathy… unless you’re a sociopath in which case please don’t get into marketing.  And this is the most important skill for marketers in 2015. Empathy.

In this brave new world of technology and data, we are presented with the greatest opportunity to reinvent marketing since the advent of the billboard. To redeem ourselves for nearly a century of obnoxious marketing. It was never supposed to be this way.

So my question for you today is this: what if the next hundred years of marketing was customer-centric? Human-centric?

Thank you.

----

Katie Martell

Katie Martell

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

5 Surprising Facts About Gender Inequality in Marketing

5 Surprising Facts About Gender Inequality in Marketing

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

My first conversation with Mary Firme was funny and erratic. Just like the two of us – full of energy and jumping around topic to topic. We had met at one of many B2B marketing trade shows on our calendars as we worked in marketing for competing organizations. By all standard expectations, it should have been a tense and curt meeting - she, the “enemy” by conventional perspective. But I couldn’t help but instantly like Mary. A kindred spirit, smart, and fearless – a trait I have found is increasingly necessary in our profession.

Mary and I continued to run into each other at events – and staying true to this first impression, we had a memorable interaction at each one.

(Case in point: during my very last trade show for the company, I threw a massive boat party. Mary approached the attendees I had invited and made sure they were equipped with motion-sickness pills, and an invitation to her own rooftop party that evening. Much to my coworkers' chagrin, I just loved it. Audacious and hilarious. Fearless.)

--

Years later Mary and I are on to different adventures in our careers. And this week, true to style, Mary boldly put her POV into the world.

She analyzed salary data within the marketing industry, and uncovered some infuriating trends. Here are five that stuck with me, but please read her original post or Slideshare, for the full data set.

1. Women have more marketing skills than men.

Women in the study dominate with skill advantage, owning the majority of 9 of the 13 skills studied including corporate communications (73% of women vs. 27% of men), branding (61% of women vs. 39% of men), and others.

TakeawayThis post is NOT here to suggest that women are inherently better at marketing than men. This issue is about equality, not comparison. The profession simply attracts more female-identified individuals. Read on.

2. Men are paid more for the same marketing skills.

*Facepalm.* Every. Single. One. of the 13 skills examined earned men more salary than women. Men paid more to do the same job. Same story, different data.

Takeaway: Ladies, we must be willing and able to negotiate salary commensurate to what we deserve. It’s a skill that is learned. And this also means we must pass it on to those we mentor.

3. Women lack the perceived skills required to meet this gap.

Perhaps it’s a matter of how the data was aggregated and reported but look at the precise skills that men “have” more of in this study (chart above.) Leadership. Business strategy. 

My non-statistically-relevant sample size of women leaders I know and have the pleasure of working with do not lack any of these skills. My gut tells me we are falling short when it comes to talking about these skills on resumes and in interviews.

Conferences and events are the biggest culprits here. Take, for example, the recent Dreamforce debacle summarized beautifully here.

"The conversation — which was titled the “Women’s Innovation Panel” — had little to do with tech or innovation. Instead, it focused extensively on parental leave policies and included such comments as, “Susan, you know something about babies,” a question about whether Wojcicki had all five of her children with the same husband(!), and a compliment on how great Alba looks in a bikini."  

Takeaway: We need to get better about talking about women in business. That is, there is nothing different about a woman in business than a man in business. We do the same job, and we should be discussed the same way.

Also, ladies, this is a reminder to toot your own horn. Get used to positioning your skills as men do. Think of Sheryl Sandberg’s consistent refrain - you’re not a bitch, you’re not bossy, you’re a leader. You’re decisive. I loved this recent article“Famous quotes, the way a woman would have to say them during a meeting.”

4. Women fall short in upward mobility.

Mary found that although 80% of entry level marketing workers are women, men obtain 64% of future leadership positions. As Mary writes, “by the end of the career climb, it’s shifted down to 37% female.”

Takeaway: Why does this happen? Of course part of it is in gender bias in the hiring process. But it takes two to tango. Studies show women wait to apply for jobs until they are 100% qualified. We must stop asking for permission to be the boss.

5. Marketing is doing better than other professions.

With our 36% share of top marketing positions, female marketers do fare better than the overall corporate average of 18% according to a recent Payscale McKinsey study.

Takeaway: We have work to do. I have a brilliant twin sister who is a PhD candidate in the field of biochemistry, and in her world of science, women are paid less, less likely to be funded, and faced with myriad gender bias in peer reviews and work culture.

--

Just this week I presented Cintell’s vision at Mass Innovation Night. Bobbie Carlton does an excellent job aggregating the latest and greatest in Boston’s startup community for a monthly event that has earned a massive following with a months-long waiting list to present.

This time it was 100% female founders and supported by what seemed like an endless array of organizations and initiatives to support women in business. Read my post here promoting some of these groups like Innovation Women and SheStarts. Events like that encourage me that there is fantastic energy being applied by smart people in the advancement of women's equality in the world of business.

But there's lots of work to do. Just recently a male colleague offered that he was growing sick of all the women-focused articles and studies. Where were the male-focused studies? Where was his movement? With every ounce of restraint I held myself back from bitch-slapping him and proclaiming "every DAY is your damn movement, every time you walk into an investor pitch or business meeting you are marching in a privilege parade!" 

Sick of hearing about it? Look, change happens when we talk about it. When we refuse to be invisible. I'll stop blogging when these numbers make sense. And honestly, I'll probably keep blogging then.

Thank you to Mary for putting your analysis into the world. And thank you for being fearless.

Stats about Gender Inequality in Marketing

Stats about Gender Inequality in Marketing

This post originally appeared on LinkedIn

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

Where Are All the Women (Speakers)?

Comment

Where Are All the Women (Speakers)?

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

Something really cool happened today. 

Entirely coincidental, but still totally awesome.

I was invited to speak on a panel at IBM's Cloud event here in Boston.

Not only was it 100% female, it also happened to include three other blonde women (an accidental circumstance according to the event organizer, Chris!) They are the brilliant:

Our fearless moderator was Sangeeta Guatam, Senior Management Consultant at IBM, and albeit not blonde, she was just as fabulous as the rest of the panel. 

Usually when I attend a panel event, or speak on one, I am a minority. Even in the seemingly female-driven world of B2B marketing, most of the speakers invited to participate are male. Now, these are not scientific numbers, but I'm sure we can all agree that on the whole, there is a major deficit. Where are all the women? 

Giving Women a Voice - Literally

I wanted to promote a fantastic new resource for women with something to say and event organizers who want to diversify their speakers: Innovation Women. Created by Bobbie Carlton (of Mass Innovation Nights), this is a new speakers bureau dedicated to removing all the excuses around not having an equal representation of gender at events. 

If you're a woman who would like more opportunities to speak at professional events, you can create a profile for a nominal yearly fee of $100. (BONUS: Use code Katie2015 to get 25% off. I promise Bobbie didn't ask me to write this.) 

If you're planning an event, it's free to browse the site to find qualified, smart, brilliant women to deliver compelling content to your audience. No excuses. 

Why I Love This

On the panel today I had the opportunity to share a quote I had recently heard from Madeline Albright:

 

I just love this. We all play a part in an ecosystem of helping each other to bridge the gaps prevalent in the workplace - yes even in 2015. Bobbie's new venture does exactly that, and at scale. 

Another resource I want to bring attention to is SheStarts, from fellow panelist Nancy Cremins. SheStarts is dedicated to supporting female entrepreneurs with an ecosystem of events, networking, and other resources. This is so critical as women starting companies just don't get the breaks men do.

Nancy offered an excellent POV on the panel today as to why. It is a common behavior for investors (the majority of whom are male) to fund and support people who look like them. (Pattern recognition.) Those entrepreneurs, in turn, become investors and continue the cycle. 

The State of Women in Entreprenuership

The homepage for Innovation Women offers up some sobering statistics: 

  • 85 percent of the companies that get venture funding have no woman on their senior management team.

  • Only 16.7 percent of the Fortune 1000 have a woman on their board.

  • Over the last 15 years, the number of female VC partners has declined from 10 to 6 percent.

And this 2014 study from Babson on venture capital funding for female entrepreneurs highlights additional perspectives: 

  • Startups with women on their executive team are 3X more likely to get VC funding now than 15 years ago.

  • However only 2.7 of venture capital investments have a woman CEO.

Ugh. But here's my favorite stat from the same study: 

Businesses with a woman on the executive team are more likely to have higher valuations at both first and last funding (64 percent higher and 49 percent higher, respectively).

Booyah!

Thank you to Chris Avery from IBM for the invitation to participate in today's panel event, and to my co-panelists for a fantastic discussion. I invite you to check out both Innovation Women (code Katie2015) and SheStarts. 

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

Comment

Whole Foods’ Mistake in Millennial Segmentation

Whole Foods’ Mistake in Millennial Segmentation

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

Whole Foods has made headlines this week for its announcement to introduce a new chain of stores to attract the mysterious millennial generation. Stock prices suffered, and media coverage has been largely negative as analysts and industry insiders debate whether this approach will effectively hit home with the intended target of 18-34 year old consumers.

One motivating factor for the decision is the sheer size of this generation. This year millennials will overtake Baby Boomers as the nation’s largest living generation in the US with 75.3 million members, according to recent population projects released by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Yum, Stale Buzzword Soup

But the issue with Whole Foods’ strategy in making this proclamation exists largely in the way in which it was positioned to the public.

Few details were included in the announcement, only that these new, smaller stores will offer all-natural food at lower prices and be specifically geared to this demographic segment. They will be “tech-savvy,” more “streamlined” in design, and “unlike any of the other stores you’re seeing out there” (whatever that means).

IMHMO (In My Humble Millennial Opinion), Whole Foods is cooking up some buzzword soup and we’re all invited to take a sip - despite the fact that it’s getting a little stale.

Robyn Bolton sums it up nicely in her article for the Harvard Business Review:

By describing this new concept as “geared toward millennial shoppers,” Whole Foods is essentially saying one (or both) of the following:

  1. Gen X and Baby Boomer shoppers are fine with or even prefer old, cluttered stores that sell a confusing array of stuff at high prices.

  2. We (Whole Foods) need to create new stores because our current ones are old and cluttered and sell all sorts of poorly organized stuff at high prices.

At least – that’s what consumers of all generations are reading between the lines.

Stale Demographic Segmentation

Robyn suggests the issue here is really in a flawed, underlying segmentation approach that is too reliant on demographics alone.

“By relying on demographics to define a consumer base, executives are implicitly, or explicitly, saying that all people of a certain demographic (in this case the same age cohort) are the same and that they are also distinctly different from everyone in other demographics.”

She argues that a better way to approach this would have been to consider the jobs-to-be-done.

Notable Harvard Business School Professor Clayton Christensen first introduced the concept of “jobs-to-be-done” about 12 year ago. This strategy takes a different approach to market segmentation, using the deeper motivations surrounding use of a product than the traditional demographic details such as age, race, location, etc.

“By understanding consumers’ jobs, companies can identify what drives their behavior and their buying decisions—and then create offerings that resolve their most important and unsatisfied jobs,” writes Robyn.

These new stores from Whole Foods may exist to meet a variety of jobs-to-be-done ranging from functional to social to emotional, but these jobs are not specific to the millennial generation, and details remain to be seen exactly how they will differentiate.

I can’t help but wonder if this announcement would have fared better in the minds of the consumers for which it was intended had Whole Foods taken a more modern approach to segmentation, or at least conveyed that message more clearly in their announcement.

Whole Foods missed an opportunity to position the new stores in a highly relevant way, instead opting to go the general, irrelevant, and potentially offensive route to a generation of 75.3 million consumers who so greatly value their individuality.

Originally published on LinkedIn, with further coverage in Marketing Magazine.

bigstock-Food-Delicious-carrot-on-the-80116010.jpg

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

Millennial Women, Stop Asking for Permission to Be Great

Comment

Millennial Women, Stop Asking for Permission to Be Great

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

It’s Time to Bridge the Aspiration Gap

The email came while I was preparing for a pitch at Geek Girl Tech Con, happening this weekend in Plymouth, MA, in the aptly named Sharkette Tank.

It came from a marketing leader I admire, to a group of women I felt honored to be included with, sharing a disturbing article by Shelly Kramer, who wrote an excellent piece about a recent Deloitte study on millennials. Shelly writes:

“Women in the millennial workforce have lower aspirations to secure top jobs and less confidence in their leadership skills than their male counterparts, according to a recent report from Deloitte.” 

[INTERNAL DIALOGUE] Say What?

And this, says Shelly, comes even as these women KNOW they are as good as, if not stronger than, their male peers when it comes to professional, communication, and creative skills once they leave college and university. What's more:

  • Just 47 percent of women aspire to be number one in their organization compared to 59 percent of men

  • When questioned about how they rated their overall leadership skills, just 21 percent of women gave themselves a “strong” rating, significantly down on the 27 percent figure for the men.

LADIES! Get. It. TOGETHER!!!

Shelly points to an excellent Harvard Business Review article from Tara Sophia Mohr, Why Women Don’t Apply for Jobs Unless They’re 100% Qualified, which examines the phenomenon of women waiting until they’re fully qualified to go for professional opportunities.

“When women encountered a promotional opportunity, they only applied if they felt they met 100% of the job requirements. Conversely, men applied for these same opportunities if they only met 60% of the job requirements.”

Why? They said they were just following the rules.

Hold Up. Wait a Minute.

The article made me pause in my tracks. I had been rehearsing the slides of my pitch, trying to condense things down to 5 minutes - no easy task. I was eager to tell the story about Cintell, how we’re building tools to help companies become more customer-centric. How our technology solves a major issue in the market and how our team, although small, has big ambition.

I thought about the role I’d be playing tomorrow as female startup co-founder, speaking to a room of women spending their Saturday learning more about tech and entrepreneurship so they can start to bridge the gaps noted in this report.

As a millennial, I was simply SHOCKED that women in my generation are less likely to believe they can be H.B.I.C. than their male counterparts, while actually being morequalified to do so. 

Enough of That. How We Can Fix This:

I have been given incredible advice in my career. One relevant lesson rings especially true, actually shared by a male mentor of mine: 

Don’t waste time asking for permission to be great.

Just go for it, ladies. Even if you’re feeling under qualified to start your own company or go for that promotion, you’re more likely suffering from imposter syndrome than anything else.

Ann Friedman covered the issue of imposter syndrome beautifully in her piece for Pacific Standard, writing:

“Experts note that impostor syndrome thrives when competition is intense and there are few mentors to provide a reality check—which seems to be a pretty apt description of the post-recession American economy. Women—who, despite slow progress in some fields, are increasingly dominant in the professional world—are far more likely than men to suffer from imposter syndrome. Many experts have posited that this is one reason for the so-called “ambition gap.” It’s not that women don’t want to succeed, it’s that, despite their education and experience, they’ve internalized messages about their lack of qualification.”

The Remedy: More Mentors!

One remedy for this issue, noted by a recipient in the email thread as well as this article, was mentorship. I couldn’t agree more, as I am fortunate to have a network of smart, capable, badass women I can reach out to (and do, often) with questions. They have given me advice and most importantly, confidence to keep going despite that nagging feeling of fear and uncertainty.  

Related post: I asked 14 marketers how to make it happen as a woman in business. Check out their advice.

If you’re a successful female executive who has survived the business world all these years, please consider spending some time giving advice and confidence to the next generation.

If you’re one of these unsure millennial women suffering from imposter syndrome, seek out a mentor to help you find the courage to go for whatever it is you’re scared to do.

And please. Stop asking for permission. 

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

Comment

3 Truths and 4 Solutions for How and Why We Buy in 2015

3 Truths and 4 Solutions for How and Why We Buy in 2015

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

“The hunt for happiness has evolved.”

I have always been interested in why people do the things they do. It’s a question I constantly ask within the framework of my life as a marketer.

On a more personal level, I apply this curiosity to people and situations on an everyday basis. If we have a conversation, I am likely wondering why you said the things you said. It’s become very much a habit. Much can be learned by asking “why?”

The answer often reveals juicy insights for a marketing or sales strategy, in parallel to my startup, Cintell. But the implications of the question go far beyond this application. Motivation is connected to the greater state of our society and culture.

A Brave New World

Particularly in the most recent decade, the ways in which we shop and consume are drastically different than ever before. Because of that, there’s a swell of new thinking, research, and ideas that I find fascinating.

One such resource is Decoding the New Consumer Mind: How and Why We Shop and Buy from Kit Yarrow, a consumer psychologist and professor who is now on my bucket list to meet in the hopes of gaining an ounce of her brilliance.

She warns marketers that what has worked before won’t work today. To make matters worse, things are changing so quickly that marketers have less time to get ready. They need to be ready.

The technological, social, and emotional changes that are now influencing consumers are easily relatable. They all apply to most of you reading this post. But consider them in the framework of marketing and it’s clear to see our work has been cut out for us.

After digesting her excellent book on a recent flight, I offer 3 truths about consumers today, and 4 strategies as presented by Kit.

Truth #1:Buyers think differently than before

Technology use is literally rewiring our brains. Smartphones, or what Resource CEO Kelly Mooney calls “weapons of personal empowerment” have changed us.

We want quick fixes to our problems, we want what’s new, we are empowered, and we seek transparency. We have a new set of emotional needs as buyers. We’re more easily distracted and have less tolerance for ambiguity – and nearly everything else that requires patience.

We are driven by an anxiety to keep track of information and an expectation that we be available around the clock. The result is continuous partial attention, a phrase attributed to Gary Small. Our brains are being trained for speed – scanning and processing mountains of information rather than focus, paying attention to detail, and patience.

Truth #2: Buyers are more guarded, but seek connection and respect

Human connection is on par with food, water, and shelter. It forms the foundations for happiness and the source of meaning and purpose in life – and yet we’ve never been more alone. Kit points out a paradox of modern society. “Although we’re genetically predisposed to connect, we can actually survive on our own. And that’s what we’re increasingly doing.”

This results in more isolation and a more “me”-centric society. Our lives are increasingly more superficial and disconnected as communication takes place via technology. This has led to a rise in our fundamental need to be seen, respected, and connected. Marketers take note.

Truth #3: Buyers are crankier, edgier, and more anxious

Even though we are still optimists by nature, we as buyers approach the market with more emotionality. Our moods and emotions have a tremendous impact on how we perceive the world, including our perceptions of brands, products, and retailers. This affects how buyers process information and make decisions – emotions enter into the appraisal and trade-off functions of buying decisions.

Narcissism is an important factor in the current state of things, as well. As narcissism is on the rise, and knowing that to some extent it exists in all of us, Kit advises marketers to harness the allure of specialness, exclusivity, secrets, and social ranking systems.

In a world where everything feels available to everyone anytime, the old-fashioned thrill of finding something special, unique and exclusive is more appealing than ever. A rare find, like a private invitation or exclusive offering, bonds consumers to a retailer or brand.

What to do?

Strategy #1: Understand that “tried and true” is simply tired and old.

Today, value is placed in what is new. “Consumers have a passionate sense of exploration, especially with technology. There’s a fertile appetite for ‘new.’” – John Digles

Brands that incorporate technology and innovation into their offerings are viewed as simply smarter, cooler, and more consumer-centric. They simply feel more relevant to modern consumers. Digital technology is so integrated into the lives of consumers, it’s like an additional body part.

“Just as consumers won’t eat, sleep, work, or play without it, they’re not shopping without it either.”

Strategy #2: Be authentic. Be the real deal.

Fewer than 3 in 10 Americans say that corporate America’s reputation is positive. The perception here is that businesses have become the antithesis of humanity. Today’s consumers are defensive and distrustful, and today’s marketers are therefore working from a deficit of trust.

As Kit says, “the key to regaining the trust of wary consumers is to get real. Humanized, authentic brands that act transparently and live up to their images are beloved.”

Deep down, buyers “want to be able to relax their guard and buy and love products without vigilance – and the brands that offer them that security have a competitive advantage.” Yes, they are dazzled by “new” and eager to explore options but they want comfort, simplicity, and pleasure of doing business with brands they know and trust.

Kit also write a line of pure poetry, in my opinion. “There’s another reason why authenticity and the real deal are so potent today – they’re the antidote to our online lives. As more and more of our time is spent in a photoshopped, intangible, and virtual online world, we increasingly crave what feels real and genuine.”

Strategy #3: Make the consumer the star.

Aspirational marketing is gone - to an extent. As individualistic consumers, we are more responsive to marketers who appear to honor, admire, and serve us.

“The consumer wants to be the star – and in a very personal way. The secret to cool is to make your customers feel cool – and smart for choosing your brand. The appreciated customer is one who’s invited to participate.”

Strategy #4: Keep it simple, but more intense.

“It takes more, faster, harder, better to break through our technology-juiced, hyperstimulated brains. Everything has to be ramped up a bit to get attention and inspire actions.”

With a world of options at our fingertips, so much to choose from, no constraints on when and where to purchase, today’s shopper needs a jolt of emotional intensity to pull the trigger on a purchase.

Kit recommends removing interference and noise such as product complexity, confusing processes, or waiting to make the shopping experience more intense, and therefore more effective.

For marketers, understand that consumers will spend less time exploring detailed information and will consider a wider variety of sources when searching for product solutions. They are looking for faster, simpler solutions to match the way they think.

---

I am so drawn to any media on the subject of understanding consumer behavior, see my post “How Did We Get Here?” for an example of what Freud did for the field in the early 1900's.

I have immense respect for those in the field such as Kit who are trained in the art and science of ethnography and psychology. I am equally grateful and inspired by their research and insights keeping us on the forefront of how our world is changing buying habits, and the resulting strategy we as marketers need to adopt.

Abstract light human brain, vector illustration

Abstract light human brain, vector illustration

This post originally appeared on LinkedIn.

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

So, How Did We Get Here?

So, How Did We Get Here?

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

The other night, I found myself asking "how did we get here?" I wasn't referring to humanity - though the more reality TV I watch the more I wonder how we ever devolved to consider this entertainment - but I specifically wondered how we arrived at this point in marketing?

We're at a confluence of art, heart and science in our industry, and it's changed the meaning of a career in marketing, increased the impact we have in our organizations, and led to a swell of innovation in the past decade as data + technology explodes with possibility.

We've certainly seen a shift from mass-marketing to personalized journeys and experiences - a move celebrated by many, especially the beleaguered consumer.

But to understand where we're going, I wanted to look at where we've been - and found myself curious as to where it all started.

I stumbled across the documentary Century of the Self. Released in 2002 by Adam Curtis and the BBC, it's free to view online and I'd recommend watching if you're interested in psychology, marketing, propaganda, consumerism, or all of the above.

Freudian Slip

Did you know Edward Bernays - the inventor of public relations - was Freud's nephew?

Bernays took Freud's ideas about human beings (you know, those repressed inner sexual desires of all humans) and used it to manipulate the masses.

He showed American corporations how to make people want things they didn't need by linking mass produced goods to unconscious desires.

Does this sound familiar?

Beginning in the early 20's, New York banks funded department stores across America - the vehicle for mass-produced goods - and Bernays' job was to produce a new type of customer.

He began to create many of the techniques of mass consumer persuasion that we now live with every day, fueling retail, fashion, and media industries.

Bernays was employed by publisher William Randolph Hearst to promote his new women's magazines. He glamorized them by placing articles and advertisements that linked products made by his other clients to famous film stars like Clara Bow - who was also his client. (Go figure.)

He began the practice of product placement in movies, and dressed the stars at the film's premiere with clothes and jewelry from other firms he represented.

He was the first person to tell a car company they could sell cars as symbols of male sexuality.

He employed psychologists to issue reports to say that products were good for you and then pretended they were independent studies.

He organized fashion shows in department stores and paid celebrities to repeat the new and essential message: you buy things not for need, but to express your inner sense of self to others.

We all have grown up with these techniques as the de facto way the world works today, and how we experience brands. To know it all came from the mind of one man influenced by his psychoanalyst uncle.... #mindblown.

Not a People Person

Perhaps the most revealing fact about Bernays was his lack of people skills. The documentary goes on to say he was inarticulate, rather funny looking, and not great with people one on one.

He was uniquely knowledgable about how people in large numbers react to knowledge and ideas. He was famous for understanding the mind of a crowd.

In fact, one of his biggest fans was Hitler's propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels.

He strikes me as the anti-marketer of today, as our industry has evolved to embrace techniques that are not solely mass-targeted, but rather driven by our understanding of the personal, unique needs of our buyers.

From mind-control to empathy. Tricks and illusion to authenticity.

How did we get here? In part, we can thank Mr. Bernays.

And now that we know the history... how fast can we continue to revolutionize the marketing function to be the advocates for the customer, rather than the puppet masters of the masses?

31569b0

31569b0

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

Bust a Move: 3 Marketing Moves I’d Like to See in 2015

1 Comment

Bust a Move: 3 Marketing Moves I’d Like to See in 2015

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

Superbowl Sunday! I’m prepping my appetite for more wings than a human should be able to consume and am especially excited about my forthcoming prosciutto-wrapped figs stuffed with goat cheese (which I will closely resemble after the game.) As a life-long Bostonian I am of course rooting for Tommy-B and the Deflated Balls of New England… but ABOVE ALL I am really looking forward to the touchdown celebration moves. Here’s a list of the top 10 best touchdown moves you’ll never see again due to regulations.

Busting a move is not reserved for the well-paid (ahem… overpaid?) employees of the NFL. You too can take a page from Young MC and bust your own marketing move. Here are the top 3 marketing moves I’d love to see in 2015.

1. Customer-centricity

To be customer-centric means allowing buyers to essentially guide the strategy of product, sales, marketing and more. Customers become the “north star” that your business consistently follows. They become the “hero of your story,” (to quote Ann Handley). Strategically, this is the difference between being product-centered vs. customer-centric.

George Colony, CEO of Forrester, even goes as far to state:

“Companies must transform to be customer-obsessed enterprises. Customer obsession focuses strategy, energy, and budget on processes that enhance knowledge of and engagement with customers – and prioritizes them over maintaining traditional (and crumbling) competitive barriers.”

Source: The Digital Marketer: Ten New Skills You Must Learn to Stay Relevant and Customer-Centric

2. A Balancing Act of the Art, the Heart and the Science

In the world of Mad Men Madison Avenue, marketing was mostly art. Creatives were in control and fueled by martinis or whiskey, national ads dependent on visuals, clever phrasing and wit, and a gleam of consumer insight. Fast forward to the last 5 years and marketing has (clearly) changed dramatically.

The rise of the empowered consumer, huge amounts of data trails left behind from buyers' digital behavior, and a wealth of marketing technology has swung the marketing industry to the opposite end on the art-to-science spectrum. We are to be marketing technologists in 2015.

But in the rush from art to science, I think we’ve lost a little of the “heart” behind what drives buyer behavior and what our brands can do to connect in a compassionate way. Marketers should remain empathetic experts on buyer personas and preferences as much as we are data-driven and analytical.

Making assumptions about buyers should fall by the wayside with the availability of data and insight to validate or invalidate deep-seated beliefs about buyers. Yes, insights from big data and analytics are driving a new era of customer intelligence and predictive analytics. But there must be a balance between blindly adopting the analytics and strategy driven by stats, and strategy decisions that are driven by instincts and customer voice.

It’s not really about left brain vs right brain anymore: the new truth is that marketing is a trifecta of art, heart and science.

3. Stop Talking and Start Listening

We’re in marketing – of course we’re good at talking. My own father once told me I could “talk a dog off a meat wagon.” But when it comes to your buyers: start listening. Great marketing is not just about amplification. It must incorporate the voice of your customer. What ever happened to the buzz around customer voice programs?

I recommend a read-through of this excellent article by Tony Zambito, “Listening and Empathy: Making Your Marketing More Human-Centered.”

If you’re like the majority of B2B marketers who feel as though their content marketing and B2B marketing efforts are only effective less than 40% of the time, it’s time to re-examine how to connect your organization to its customers and buyers.

Try creating a dialogue and listening to your intended recipients. Observe them. You'll develop a better understanding of the drivers that affect your buyers as human beings every day. Really, try it. I promise it will deliver some quick ideas for you to develop more effective content, messaging, and more.

---

So, there’s my wish-list for marketers in 2015. A more human-centered approach, marketing with heart, and leading the customer-centric dynamic shift in your organization.

As for tonight, I’d like Julian Edelman to throw another touchdown pass like he did in the playoffs… because that was just awesome.

What do you think?

Patriots

Patriots

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

1 Comment

Authenticity is Not an Excuse

Authenticity is Not an Excuse

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.

Recently, at Logan airport here in Boston, I picked up a copy of the Harvard Business Review. This has become a common habit of mine before a flight, as I welcome the uninterrupted reading time and chance to feel a little smarter than when I boarded. What really caught my eye this time was the cover story, “The Authenticity Paradox.”

I had recently published a post on the importance of authenticity to millennials (Introducing the Millennial CMO) in which I encouraged brands, especially B2B, to get rid of the BS, and re-invigorate authenticity into their marketing.

But authenticity is not a universally positive trait. This excellent article by author Herminia Ibarra gave me interesting new insight into the limits of authenticity as it applies to our careers and leadership styles.

What is Authenticity in Business?

For me, I equate authenticity with honesty. It’s traditionally used to describe a work of art that is an original, not a copy. However, in the article Ibarra expounds the idea that authenticity is used in leadership as an identity trait that actually may cause some leaders to get “stuck.”

“When we view authenticity as an unwavering sense of self, we struggle to take on new challenges and bigger roles. The reality is that people learn – and change – who they are through experience.”

R1501C_A

R1501C_A

Leaders may latch on to authenticity as an excuse for sticking with what’s comfortable. But, and this is something I feel every day as a new entrepreneur, few jobs allow for us to stay in our comfort zones forever.

“As we strive to improve our game, a clear and firm sense of self is a compass that helps us navigate choices and progress toward our goals. But when we’re looking to change our game, a too-rigid self concept becomes an anchor that keeps us from sailing forth.”

Adaptive Authenticity

Ibarra suggests that by trying out different leadership styles and behaviors, we grow more than we would through introspection alone. She calls this approach “adaptive authenticity.”

Those who can develop their personal styles are described as chameleons. They are able and willing to adapt to the demands of a situation without feeling fake, or like an imposter.

Those with a tendency to express what they really think and feel, even when it runs counter to situation demands, are dubbed “true-to-selfers” and may stick too long with what’s comfortable instead of evolving as they gain insight and experience.

Ex: Know Your Audience

The way I see it, adaptive authenticity is in part applying the basics of marketing to your career and day-to-day leadership style. Know your audience, and adapt to suit their needs.

For example, the article describes a senior manager who was very successful – doubled revenue, redesigned core processes in her unit.

But her boss didn’t consider her to be an inspirational leader, and the chairman of the board at her parent company often became impatient at her detail oriented presentation style.

She knew she wasn’t communicating effectively in her role as a board member. Her feedback was to “step up and do the vision thing” but to her, it felt like manipulation. She refused to, quote “play on people’s emotions,” and create emotional messages to inspire/influence others, instead choosing to rely on facts, figures, and spreadsheets.

As a result, she seemed to pursue contradicting goals by pushing hard on the facts instead of pulling the board chairman in as a valued ally.

This is about seeing our jobs as a collective win – not just a selfish pursuit. It’s about selling ourselves effectively and understanding the dynamics around us.

Yum... Humble Pie

Negative feedback is key to improvement. However, the article points out that many leaders often convince themselves that dysfunctional aspects of their “natural” style are the inevitable price of being effective.

For example, Margaret Thatcher.

“Those who worked with her knew she could be merciless if someone failed to prepare as thoroughly as she did. She was capable of humiliating a staff member in public, she was a notoriously bad listener, and she believed that compromise was cowardice. As she became known to the world as the “Iron Lady,” Thatcher grew more and more convinced of the rightness of her ideas and the necessity of her coercive methods. She could beat anyone into submission with the power of her rhetoric and conviction, and she only got better at it. Eventually, though, it was her undoing—she was ousted by her own cabinet.”

How to be Adaptively Authentic

Ibarra suggests thinking of leadership development as trying on possible selves. It’s OK to be inconsistent from one day to the next. That’s not being a fake; it’s how we experiment to figure out what’s right for new challenges and circumstances we face.

“Such growth doesn’t require a radical personality makeover. Small changes – in the way we carry ourselves, the way we communicate, the way we interact – often make a world of difference in how effectively we lead. The adaptive approach to authenticity can make us feel like imposters, but it’s outside our comfort zones that we learn the most about leading effectively.”

Be yourself. But to succeed as a leader, we must be willing to evolve what that means over time.

Thatcher_Eyes_640_s640x427

Thatcher_Eyes_640_s640x427

Every week(ish) I send out new ideas, writings, and interesting links on marketing, business, and life. It’s free & curated by me. Get on the list.